Skip to main content

God's Word; A flame that cannot be quenched

 http://www.bayviewbaptist.org/clientimages/21617/weeping%20prophet.jpg

What an example Jeremiah is in the Old Testament. He really never saw good times for his nation. He was divinely appointed to prophesy of the judgement to come. And in chapter 20 of his book, Jeremiah tells of his persecution. Pashur, a chief governor at that time, took Jeremiah and "placed him in the stocks," just for relaying God's message to Israel regarding the captivity to come. After he confronts Pashur and is put in the stocks, Jeremiah speaks of quitting on God. He states in verses 7-8 that he is weak, perhaps too weak in his own eyes to endure the persecution and mocking, which he described as a "daily" occurrence. But then Jeremiah makes a profound statement in verse nine: "Then I said, I will not make mention of him, nor speak any more in his name. But his word was in mine heart as a burning fire shut up in my bones, and I was weary with forbearing, and I could not stay."

Jeremiah's flesh wanted to give up in a state of weakness, but because God's word dwelt in him, he was unable to fight against it. That word burned within him, making it impossible for him to fight against its convicting power. Ultimately, Jeremiah grew tired of fighting ("forbearing") this burning word within him and he was unable to contain it ("I could not stay").

Oh how we should strive to be more like Jeremiah. That we should be so engrossed by God's Word that it consumes our being, so much so, that we are unable to remain silent. The more trouble the world seems to bring our way, the more we have to fight against the flesh's desire to quit doing what God' wants us to do. And the only way to combat the weakness of our flesh is to bury God's Word bone deep. Then, when the world seeks to mock and persecute us, we can rely on God's Word to burn its way to the surface, keeping us on fire for Him to the point we are unable to keep silent about it!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

God's Word - The Moral Compass

A few weeks ago, I was out in my garage organizing a bunch of unwanted items for a garage sale. To kill the silence, I turned on the radio. One of my favorite things to listen to is talk radio, usually on the AM dial. I also like listening to Crosstalk on CleanAirFM, which is what I tuned in to that day. The topic of the discussion that day entailed a photography company being tried in a discrimination case involving their refusal to provide services to a homosexual couple. The photography company clearly stated they reserved the right to withhold services at anytime if the event or business opportunity violated their religiously held beliefs. This is a stipulation many businesses, especially Christian businesses, adopt to protect themselves and their moral standards. The host of the show laid the groundwork for discussion by siding with the photography company saying that it was their right to withhold services and that it was wrong for the courts to proceed with discrimination charge...

"And We Esteemed Him Not"

During a recent Sunday evening service, Pastor Bickelhaupt asked what it was that is so important as to keep church members from attending church when they know the doors are open and services are being held. He went on to say that people willfully reject the prospect of meeting with Christ Himself (as His presence is promised when the church meets together in His name). Jesus promises in Matthew 18:20, “For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.”  Pastor implied that there are too many professing Christians who find it preferable to attend the weekly Sunday morning worship hour, but find gracing the church building outside of that service to be merely optional, an inconvenience, or just not that important.   It got me thinking. What could possibly be more important than meeting with the Savior?! Here is Someone Who gave everything for us. He literally sacrificed a heavenly abode for an earthly bed mat, for scripture reveals ...

Making the Case for "Assault"-Style Weapons: It's a Heart Issue

In the wake of the recent school shootings in America, many have asked, "Why do we need access to "assault"-style weaponry as private citizens?" So... here's my take on the Second Amendment. Not to be argumentative... just posing a logical explanation. Let's say our government does begin to radically infringe upon our rights. Let's say a dictatorship does arise. The sole intent of the Founding Fathers to arm its people was to protect against a rogue government.  "But they never envisioned the type of guns we have today." This is the argument of many, which in my estimation falls flat on its face. Though they're right and it's true, the Founders could never have imagined the realm of destruction and devastation our modern-day privately-owned weapons wield. But they also never envisioned a government that has the military weaponry ours does today either. Can you imagine a suppressed citizenry trying to defend with single-s...